Measuring Inconsistency Methods for Evidentiary Value
نویسنده
چکیده
Many inconsistency analysis methods may be used to detect altered records or statements. But for admission as evidence, the reliability of the method has to be determined and measured. For example, in China, for evidence to be admitted, it has to have 95% certainty of being correct, and that certainty must be shown to the court, while in the US, evidence is admitted if it is more probative than prejudicial (a >50% standard). In either case, it is necessary to provide a measurement of some sort in order to pass muster under challenges from the other side. And in most cases, no such measurement has been undertaken.
منابع مشابه
Measuring Inconsistency through Minimal Inconsistent Sets
In this paper, we explore the links between measures of inconsistency for a belief base and the minimal inconsistent subsets of that belief base. The minimal inconsistent subsets can be considered as the relevant part of the base to take into account to evaluate the amount of inconsistency. We define a very natural inconsistency value from these minimal inconsistent sets. Then we show that the ...
متن کاملComputing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics
Measuring inconsistency in knowledge bases has been recognized as an important problem in several research areas. Many methods have been proposed to solve this problem and a main class of them is based on some kind of paraconsistent semantics. However, existing methods suffer from two limitations: 1) They are mostly restricted to propositional knowledge bases; 2) Very few of them discuss comput...
متن کاملMeasuring Inconsistency in Argument Graphs
There have been a number of developments in measuring inconsistency in logic-based representations of knowledge. In constrast, the development of inconsistency measures for computational models of argument has been limited. To address this shortcoming, this paper provides a general framework for measuring inconsistency in abstract argumentation, together with some proposals for specific measure...
متن کاملAnalyzing Inconsistencies in Probabilistic Conditional Knowledge Bases using Continuous Inconsistency Measures
Probabilistic conditional logic is a knowledge representation formalism that uses probabilistic conditionals (if-then rules) to model uncertain and incomplete information. By applying the principle of maximum entropy one can reason with a set of probabilistic conditionals in an information-theoretical optimal way, provided that the set is consistent. As in other fields of knowledge representati...
متن کاملHypothesis-Based Investigation of Digital Timestamps
Timestamps stored on digital media play an important role in digital investigations. Unfortunately, timestamps may be manipulated, and also refer to a clock that can be erroneous, failing or maladjusted. This reduces the evidentiary value of timestamps. This paper takes the approach that historical adjustments to a clock can be hypothesized in a clock hypothesis. Clock hypotheses can then be te...
متن کامل